escort ordu kıbrıs escort escort izmit escort bodrum escort rize escort konya escort kırklareli escort van halkalı escort escort erzurum escort sivas escort samsun escort tokat altinrehbereskisehir.com konyachad.com sakaryaehliyet.com tiktaktrabzon.com escortlarkibris.net canakkalesondaj.com kayseriyelek.com buderuskonya.com Lonsdales Review No 20 ? Bolivar Gold Medal - UK Cigar Forums

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lonsdales Review No 20 ? Bolivar Gold Medal

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lonsdales Review No 20 ? Bolivar Gold Medal

    Bolivar Gold Medal
    Size: 165 mm x 42 ? Cervantes
    Smoke time: 1 hour (Terminated)
    Box date: 2008. (Reinstated Standard Production) Source: Rab (Lionhound)

    First appearance: Distinctive. The branding obscures two thirds of the cigar, from the handsome gold foil wrap fixed by the Bolivar Standard band ?B? to the red LCdH band below. Second appearance: Metro elegant. Slightly rusticated, ochre green tinged wrapper with an almost invisible spiral carrying several prominent veins within a tracery of lighter veins and topped by a neatly applied triple cap.

    Construction: The cigar was nicely packed with a reasonable yield and felt well balanced and good to hold ?in the hand?. The cold draw was reassuringly lightly resistive and the smoking draw was perfect. The burn for the most part was straight although I did have to make one small correction. The ash was solidly compacted and well behaved throughout the smoke. No re-lights required.

    Flavour: Pre-light aroma was light barnyard with a vegetal/aniseed edge. The start was very good, earthy and decidedly salty. The expected vegetal/fruit flavours when they arrived were however very faint. Into the cigar and the fruit tastes strengthened a little but were sour, lacking in any sweetness whatsoever. The familiar Cuban citric ?twang? was detectable, but subterranean and buried buy the general woody earthiness of the smoke. The taste which the smoke was leaving in my mouth although sour was not at this point unrefreshing. Retro-hale (which I?m not a master of) did improve things a little in that the citrus seemed sharper and I could also pick out some spice notes. I had realised something wasn?t quite right before the end of the first third and on reaching the second the experience became steadily worse. The cigar was by now smoking ?flat?, just tobacco with a chemical acridity that made flavour identification impossible, and the taste left in my mouth had become greasy and not particularly pleasant. I smoked to about half way hoping things might get better, but this cigar I know and love well and the disappointment was to much to bare. The last picture is where I left it to die in the ashtray.

    Overall: One huge upset. I?ve smoked Boli GMs on numerous occasions ? they are one of my favourite cigars ? this however was nothing like any I have previously smoked from the set I got from Rab (all of which have been excellent), and can only conclude that the example I picked on today was undergoing a classic sick period. What little muted flavour interest there was in cigar was all in the front third anything else was just burning greasy tobacco.

    Marks. Today I?m not giving the Boli GM any mark. The Partagas 898 is still the undisputed leader.

    Next Lonsdales .... Por Larranaga ER Germany 2006.
    Attached Files
    If you want to, you can.
    And, if you can, you must!

  • #2
    Arf, sorry you had a bad smoke.
    I've been waiting for you to do this review for quite a while 'cos every one else has raved about them...I've only had two, with the same type of result that you've just found...perhaps I'm not going mad after all..

    Comment


    • #3
      Arf if you had not written down the year i would say you were smoking a very young cigar,could be a dud or maybe going into another "sick period" as you say

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Puff Scotty View Post
        Arf, sorry you had a bad smoke.
        I've been waiting for you to do this review for quite a while 'cos every one else has raved about them...I've only had two, with the same type of result that you've just found...perhaps I'm not going mad after all..
        to late for that mate

        Comment


        • #5
          Your probably right Pete....

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Puff Scotty View Post
            Arf, sorry you had a bad smoke.
            I've been waiting for you to do this review for quite a while 'cos every one else has raved about them...I've only had two, with the same type of result that you've just found...perhaps I'm not going mad after all..
            Sad thing Dave and Pete is I've reviewed this cigar before .... with a totally different result:- http://www.ukcigarforums.com/showthr...var+Gold+Medal
            If you want to, you can.
            And, if you can, you must!

            Comment


            • #7
              Sounds like s dud to me. Can happen occasionally.

              I had to bin a different (and well regarded boil) a few weeks ago because it was really nasty.

              Sent from happy, clappy, tappy.
              Originally posted by Simon Bolivar
              Little medical correction there Steve, you will surely die...but not from smoking these

              Originally posted by Ryan
              I think that's for lighting electronic cigarettes

              Comment


              • #8
                Arf, Thanks for the review as you know I am a big fan of these and I am disappointed you had a duff one, as has been said, maybe another sick period. I am going to try one on Sunday and see if there has been a change in my stock over the last few months, (i dont think I have smoked one for about 3 months, so its well over due to try another).

                Comment


                • #9
                  Damn sick periods

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X