If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I agree, but what happens when they are one of the parties involved, should they have the right to end the arguement as a MOD when in fact they are directly involved in it?
"Come in here, dear Boy, have a cigar" ....Roger Waters (Pink Floyd)
How long before this thread is shut down because of a lack of agreement with the content? It's much easier to close a thread & have your say after it is closed than it is to sustain a reasoned argument.
What would I know? I'm just a backwoods roo packin crim from New Holland! LOL. (Thankyou El Cat)
Were as members are the voice of a forum, Moderators are trusted to be the spokesmen of said forum. I think it was in bad taste what was said to Jenady, as has been stated sarcasm doesn't work very well when typed, and maybe that was the goal, but that one post has potentially given this forum a bad name. I'm all for Cat to be a mod, he's of sound mind, oh hang on.......
Were as members are the voice of a forum, Moderators are trusted to be the spokesmen of said forum. I think it was in bad taste what was said to Jenady, as has been stated sarcasm doesn't work very well when typed, and maybe that was the goal, but that one post has potentially given this forum a bad name. I'm all for Cat to be a mod, he's of sound mind, oh hang on.......
I never said that I had surmised that he was "Sound" but I'm sure El Cat doesnt "Mind" LOL.
What would I know? I'm just a backwoods roo packin crim from New Holland! LOL. (Thankyou El Cat)
I agree, but what happens when they are one of the parties involved, should they have the right to end the arguement as a MOD when in fact they are directly involved in it?
The key I think is being able to decide when a (debate) has disintegrated into an (arguement) .... which in turn is becoming more personal.
Then, yes the Mod should be trusted to terminate a thread if that is what they believe at that time is the right thing to do.
If you want to, you can.
And, if you can, you must!
I am sure that all MODs are unbiased without any doubt in my mind anyway.
Yeah I'll go along with that ..... I used to think TJ just hated and despised Newbee's ..... but now I realise he just hates and despises everybody equally!
If you want to, you can.
And, if you can, you must!
All this arguing stuff has all been a dastardly Mod and Catador plot to goad our (in)famous Mexican into posting his 3000th post.
Well, it ain't worked Catador, the silence from Chihuahua is deafening .... an' you ain't gonna be a Mod!
On TJ's behalf I vote 'AYE'!
He'd do it himself, except he's gone on another mystical journey of self-discovery after eating one of them Merciless Peppers of Quetzlzacatenango (Grown deep in the jungle primeval by the inmates of a Guatemalan insane asylum), so far he's found 25 Pesos and a half eaten 'Twinky'. Also, I heard that smoking a Nepalese Culebra he got sent from a BOTL in Amsterdam has 'put the great one down'.
After all without moderators forums will inevitably be plagued by anarchy and unrest.
Quite right!
As I understand it (Just had a copy of the 'Mod-eraters Handbook' emailed to me), the MOD's have an annual meeting to discuss: Rules, code-violators, remuneration packages (Half a peck of rough cider a month, and all the peanut M&M's your dentist will permit).
This years meeting was apparently at Stonehenge at dawn on the Summer Solstice, Deano bought every one a druids costume and a bacon and egg sandwich.
They should be impartial, objective, setting an example for the majority, and sacrificing themselves for the greater good. I am of course speaking in generic terms.
Yes, That's what I've been told too.
Think of the MOD's as a Jedi Council of war.
TJ is the Chancellor , Deano - Yoda , and CJ - Mace Windu etc.
Comment