Padron 1926 and 1964.Looking for feedback, as I have never tried them at all.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Padron?
Collapse
X
-
Great stogies and would think right up your alley. Both are wonderful smokes and worth the $. However ,Kristoff cigars are IMHO in the same arena at about 1/2 the price. Read the reviews on Kristoffs and burn one and more then likely you'll agree !!
Just my Humble opinion.
-
i personally would have a padron anniversary over most any cc i have ever tried.....and the 45th? well there are a bunch of people over there about to give their opinion on that one real soon. i for one say their cigars are pretty much some of the best $ can buy. when you compare a cc price with a padron of similar size the price isnt much different. even their normal line is great.
Comment
-
Originally posted by whisky77 View PostPadron 1926 and 1964.Looking for feedback, as I have never tried them at all.
Bloody top smokes....I have both in my Humi, and would not be with out them..
1926 #6 is tops followed by the #9
PM me your addy Whisk and I will send you a couple to try...Love Life - Love Cigars
Comment
-
Maduro 1926.
Thanks for the feedback lads, much appreciated. Thanks for the generous offer Cohiba IV.
I think I will opt for the 1926.I like the look of the Maduro wrappers.Cheers again for the honest feedback."Keep your eyes peeled, your arse up, head down, and your ear to the gound" WHISKY77
Comment
-
No doubt Padron 1926 & 1964 are top quality smokes (I've a 64 torpedo in the humi somewhere I think), but am I the only one who kind of wishes they made them in the regular shape instead of only box pressed, they always feel a little weird in my hand (probably just me )"The best cigar you'll ever smoke is the one you're smoking at the minute" - Zino Davidoff
Comment
Powered by vBulletin® Version 5.7.5
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT. This page was generated at 04:21 AM.
Comment