escort ordu kıbrıs escort escort izmit escort bodrum escort rize escort konya escort kırklareli escort van halkalı escort escort erzurum escort sivas escort samsun escort tokat altinrehbereskisehir.com konyachad.com sakaryaehliyet.com tiktaktrabzon.com escortlarkibris.net canakkalesondaj.com kayseriyelek.com buderuskonya.com Beatles vs. Stones - UK Cigar Forums

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Beatles vs. Stones

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Beatles vs. Stones

    Alright, now that we have all of these remasters out, the ultimate theological question: Beatles or Stones?
    37
    The Beatles
    43.24%
    16
    The Rolling Stones
    40.54%
    15
    How Could You Make Me Decide?
    16.22%
    6

  • #2
    Paint it black or Day tripper...

    Going to have to go with the latter

    Comment


    • #3
      Both good in their own rights

      I Wanna Hold Your Hand
      Honky Tonk Women

      She tried to take me upstairs.............
      Hold your hand ?
      WOW totally different stages to foreplay

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by G-man View Post
        I Wanna Hold Your Hand
        Honky Tonk Women

        She tried to take me upstairs.............
        Hold your hand ?
        WOW totally different stages to foreplay
        Kind of a rough comparison given that Hold Your Hand was released in 1964 and Honky Tonk Women in 1969; a lot happened between those years, though you're right about one thing--the Beatles were not as interesting in singing about getting laid.

        Comment


        • #5
          I think for song writing craft the probably The Beatles.
          For sheer sleazy rock and roll then the Stones in their pomp.
          Beggars Banquet, Sticky Fingers, Exile...Yeah!
          Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.

          Comment


          • #6
            ive never gotten into the stones, and ive tried i really have.
            i just find they have a lot of attitude and not much soul, slightly fake dare i say it

            falling in love with early beatles... all the covers... all the 2 minute gems

            with the beatles... great album: devil in her heart, money, you really got a hold on me (the live BBC version of this is just incredible), all i've got to do, it won't be long, till there was you...

            HEAVEN!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Lascaux View Post
              ive never gotten into the stones, and ive tried i really have.
              i just find they have a lot of attitude and not much soul, slightly fake dare i say it

              falling in love with early beatles... all the covers... all the 2 minute gems

              with the beatles... great album: devil in her heart, money, you really got a hold on me (the live BBC version of this is just incredible), all i've got to do, it won't be long, till there was you...

              HEAVEN!
              Have you heard the mono remixes? They're outstanding, and it's really cool to A/B the mono and stereo mixes of Revolver, Rubber Soul, and the White Album.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by satch View Post
                I think for song writing craft the probably The Beatles.
                For sheer sleazy rock and roll then the Stones in their pomp.
                Beggars Banquet, Sticky Fingers, Exile...Yeah!
                Absolutely--my favorite is Sticky Fingers, followed up by Exile.

                Comment


                • #9
                  i havent heard the mono mixes, they'd be a godsend as I listen a lot of with my headphones. a full stereo beatles album gets a bit trippy through phones hehe

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Like the Beatles, don't get me wrong but it's like Muzac.

                    The Stones is down and dirty, the first three albums took me down so many wonderful roads of discovery when I was young. In those days before the glimmer twins discovered writing their own tunes and while Brian Jones was still 'with it' they played fantastic covers of old blues songs.

                    They led me to Arthur Alexander, down the road apiece (still in my top ever songs) and so many more.

                    And that's before they moved on to write some of the worlds greatest rock songs, and they are still at it.

                    Britains greatest export brand!

                    Now if you are going to have a Stones vs Who poll I am in real trouble.
                    Nic
                    Editor UK Cigar Scene Magazine

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Have to say was brought up on Beatles by my drumming father. Have never been in to the stones so Beatles for me, love their later stuff.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by nicwing View Post
                        Like the Beatles, don't get me wrong but it's like Muzac.
                        Those are fighting words, Sir! Help, Sgt. Pepper, Revolver, Rubber Soul, The White Album...I'd like to hear the argument for the Muzacalness of these great records.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Dylan

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Magical mystery tour, hey jude to name but a few that I love.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Stones for me definitely.

                              Beatles certainly wrote some great songs, can't deny that, but they also wrote a lot of stuff that to me was commercial crap playing to their image. Their better stuff was more the stuff that didn't necessarily fit their image.

                              Stones were more raunchy and cutting edge and pushed the boundaries more in my opinion. They upset people with the raw nature of there music and lyrics but stuck to it and proved that there was a big audience out there looking for something different, more explicit and exciting.

                              Like I say, the beatles did have some great songs but I think that often they wrote stuff that would suit their fans, whereas the Stones seemed to write what they felt and what they wanted to play, take it or leave it.
                              Could be this was record label decisions as Beatles had some great stuff that was never released as singles while Stones management maybe gave them a free-er rein.

                              Was always the cleancut Beatles or the rebellious Stones and for me the Rebels won.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X