escort ordu kıbrıs escort escort izmit escort bodrum escort rize escort konya escort kırklareli escort van halkalı escort escort erzurum escort sivas escort samsun escort tokat altinrehbereskisehir.com konyachad.com sakaryaehliyet.com tiktaktrabzon.com escortlarkibris.net canakkalesondaj.com kayseriyelek.com buderuskonya.com Interesting Analysis of 2010 - UK Cigar Forums

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Interesting Analysis of 2010

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Interesting Analysis of 2010

    Just thought I'd share this with you, from the last Cigar Insider of the year (CI being the subscription newsletter of Cigar Aficionado). They have analysed their scores from 2010 in many different ways, and in many different categories. This particular table was of interest I though, splitting this year's scores from Cuba down into brand averages (obviously only taking into account the cigars from those brands which were actually 'tested' this year):

    (The columns are: Brand / Number tested / Avg score / Avg price)



    Of course, there is always the debate over scores, they are subjective and will always be influenced by personal tastes and preferences. However, I thought it was interesting...
    My cigar review blog: The Cigar Monologues (Twitter / Facebook)
    My Company:
    Siparium Sporting

  • #2
    Not much spread is there!? Suggests to me that scoring cigars is somewhat meaningless.
    Or you could take it to indicate that quality over the past year has been pretty consistent!

    Comment


    • #3
      Simon, where they taking price into consideration? That might acount for the Cohiba low scoring. The other thing that strikes me, are they really the going UK rate for those smokes these days? Glad I built up my collection over the last few yrs, very few of which ever saw UK shores (has to be some advantage of living across the Chanel).
      Simon Bolivar: Liberator of Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru & Venezuela.

      Comment


      • #4
        JL

        Very surprised at some of the findings TBH. Glad to see Juan Lopez are rated as highly. Smoking a 2008 JL No2 as I type this and they are a hard act to follow.
        "Keep your eyes peeled, your arse up, head down, and your ear to the gound" WHISKY77

        Comment


        • #5
          And the scorer does appear to have been determined enough to try all three Behike .... not that I'm suspiciously cynical or anything!
          If you want to, you can.
          And, if you can, you must!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Simon Bolivar View Post
            That might acount for the Cohiba low scoring.
            Or that Cohiba is over rated and deserves that score?

            My surprise is how low partagas is!

            Comment


            • #7
              Scoring a marca on the basis of 1 cigar tested is ridiculous!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Jimmeh View Post
                My surprise is how low partagas is!
                That's what struck me too!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Smallclub View Post
                  Scoring a marca on the basis of 1 cigar tested is ridiculous!
                  Just as well that's not what they're doing then, isn't it... They are just showing an average of the scores received by cigars by that marque which were reviewed this year. Essentially, in CI's case, it's almost entirely LEs, REs and new releases (e.g. the BHKs).
                  My cigar review blog: The Cigar Monologues (Twitter / Facebook)
                  My Company:
                  Siparium Sporting

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Simon-JG-hr View Post
                    Just as well that's not what they're doing then, isn't it... They are just showing an average of the scores received by cigars by that marque which were reviewed this year. Essentially, in CI's case, it's almost entirely LEs, REs and new releases (e.g. the BHKs).
                    Isn't that exactly what the table represents?

                    1 JL smoked and 4 RA smoked over the year so the RA average score is far more accurate (RA only have 3 cigars in regular production, so a fair score for the brand probably, brands with lots of vitolas, Partagas, RyJ, Monte, etc, are not represented fairly or accurately at all)

                    Table is pointless IMHO, sites like cigar-review.org are much better source for info like this.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Nowhere near enough data for this to be close to relevant. A sad reflection of self-aggrandising editorial policy even to publish it IMHO.

                      Still no change there
                      Originally posted by Simon Bolivar
                      Little medical correction there Steve, you will surely die...but not from smoking these

                      Originally posted by Ryan
                      I think that's for lighting electronic cigarettes

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        So one JL was tested & it heads the list on an average from one cigar versus RA with 4 tested & I can guarantee at least one scored well above the JL. What a load of tripe! Trinidad below Monte Open? HaHaHaaaaaaHaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!
                        What would I know? I'm just a backwoods roo packin crim from New Holland! LOL. (Thankyou El Cat)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I have very little respect for Cigar Aficionado... however I'm always going on the website just to see how weird it is, it's like slowing down to look at a car crash.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Anyone interested in trading Behikes for Juan Lopez- PM me.
                            "Living well, is the best revenge."

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              What a load of drivel over nothing, interesting... not! I think Simon just put these meaningless stats up to get a larf...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X