Okay people I need some help understanding your thinking on something?..
When the Cohiba Grand Reserva came out I gave it a few tries and wrote about it on here. The general reaction was that people did not want to try a cigar that cost ?85 quid no matter how good it was; apparently nothing could be worth that much.
Less than a year later Cohiba launch the Behike range, another expensive but not quit so expensive cigar. People wait with baited breath, pay significant money to attend London launch parties and several people buy entire boxes without having even tried one.
WHAT THE HELL? Why the difference? There is a price difference yes. A box of Grand Reservas is way more than a box of even the Behike 56 but not to even try one Grand Reserva seems illogical when you are willing to pay far more for a box of a reputedly lesser cigar. If you are going to spend crazy money on a cigar once in a while then why not try ?supposedly? the best?
Is it because you guys like to see a shiny box in the humi? Is it because of the reputation that the new range tried to inherit from the original ultra-rare and ultra-expensive Behike?
I just cannot understand the difference in thinking and differing reactions to ?two? EXPENSIVE cigars from the same cigar house. Is it hypocrisy or am I clearly missing something more subtle, which is would be very like me.
Anybody?
T.
When the Cohiba Grand Reserva came out I gave it a few tries and wrote about it on here. The general reaction was that people did not want to try a cigar that cost ?85 quid no matter how good it was; apparently nothing could be worth that much.
Less than a year later Cohiba launch the Behike range, another expensive but not quit so expensive cigar. People wait with baited breath, pay significant money to attend London launch parties and several people buy entire boxes without having even tried one.
WHAT THE HELL? Why the difference? There is a price difference yes. A box of Grand Reservas is way more than a box of even the Behike 56 but not to even try one Grand Reserva seems illogical when you are willing to pay far more for a box of a reputedly lesser cigar. If you are going to spend crazy money on a cigar once in a while then why not try ?supposedly? the best?
Is it because you guys like to see a shiny box in the humi? Is it because of the reputation that the new range tried to inherit from the original ultra-rare and ultra-expensive Behike?
I just cannot understand the difference in thinking and differing reactions to ?two? EXPENSIVE cigars from the same cigar house. Is it hypocrisy or am I clearly missing something more subtle, which is would be very like me.
Anybody?
T.
Comment