Apparently HSA has recently announced that it will soon release an RyJ Petit Churchill with a size of 4 1/8 x50: http://www.halfwheel.com/press-relea...it-churchills/
This is probably really anal of me, but I find the names 'Short Churchill', 'Wide Churchill' and now 'Petit Churchill' irritating. I think that the term 'Churchill' should be reserved to describe Julieta No. 2 sized cigars (7x47). Why not call the new Petit Churchill the RyJ Petit Robusto, seeing as it's a petit robusto in size?
Anyway, does the RyJ brand really need another short and fat cigar? I think not. How about a RyJ lancero instead?
Ok, rant over. What are your thoughts about this new release?
This is probably really anal of me, but I find the names 'Short Churchill', 'Wide Churchill' and now 'Petit Churchill' irritating. I think that the term 'Churchill' should be reserved to describe Julieta No. 2 sized cigars (7x47). Why not call the new Petit Churchill the RyJ Petit Robusto, seeing as it's a petit robusto in size?
Anyway, does the RyJ brand really need another short and fat cigar? I think not. How about a RyJ lancero instead?
Ok, rant over. What are your thoughts about this new release?
Comment