...you won't say that after you smoke them, lol
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Good buy or good bye?
Collapse
X
-
Having given them a second chance...I revoke my last statement!
I wanted a quick smoke tonight, so figured wasting a fake Cohiba wouldn't be a bad thing.
An hour later, and I still have a third left, the first 2 thirds being ok.
I've asked Uncle Google all about fake sticks...and although some things confirm these as fakes, some things also question that theory.
The 'Cohiba' is embossed on these. The cigars seem pretty consistent in appearance and feel.
The spacing of the lettering and blocks are quite ok, the comma is in the right place and the C of Cuba is correct.
But...the bands are loose, easy to un-stick and certainly don't meet.
A shame really, but this particular stick is no different to say, the Charatans I once smoked.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon G View PostThe bands look ok, if it wasn't for the big giveaway! The rows of little white blocks, there should be three rows above the Cohiba text, three clean clear rows that aren't cut off. The third row is clearly cut off.
I had some hooky cohibas years ago and they smoked ok. they were cohiba ish in taste, and burned well.so fake doesn't necessarily mean terrible."Dear heart, you're talking to a man- a real man- who drinks straight Tequilla, with lime and salt on the rim, and smokes cigars" (J Zavala)
Comment
-
That's because there are various degrees of fakes. There are genuine factory made cigars with the wrong bands on pretending to be something more expensive. There are custom rolls with genuine bands added to dupe the buyer, there are things that are barely cigars filled with floor sweepings and bits of dried banana leaf and so on.'Cigars are a hobby, cigarettes an addiction'
Comment
Powered by vBulletin® Version 5.7.5
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT. This page was generated at 02:04 AM.
Comment