Originally posted by rascal
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Test it yourself
Collapse
X
-
-
I have to say that the old stuff I have do have loose bands but nothing that I've purchased in my short smoking history has yes shown signs of shrinkage. I think the oldest stock I have that I have aged from new stock is about 15 month, but I'm not sure if they will lose water if I've kept them properly. I think I'm going with the oil loss. So goys to stop shrinkage keep them oily. I've just had an idea for winkie Cream!
Maintain your willy size, buy my willy cream "Oilynob" now! Limited stock.
May not give results suggested in this marketing.
PM me with your orders.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tommy View PostAlso the oils would be retained hey. Now I'm definitely no expert in any way but as the boy of the bag has wisely said those oils are likely to be the reason for the shrinkage IMO as the water content should remain constant one everything (cigars and humi) is acclimatised. That's how it seems to me. I think over time those tubes do lose their water and oils but it has to be seriously slowed. My question would be this, what would the effect of sealing in the water and oil as opposed to letting them constantly breath. I'm guessing that as the preferred method is to age in STB Cabs, the optimal configuration is tightly packed in little boxes which are kept in a cigar haven.
But there is a difference between shrunk cigars and the cigar not being strangled by the band
Comment
-
Originally posted by TonyN View PostTotaly agree with you on that one but can you explain why the ones in the tubes which are different brand but same year haven't shrunk.Give me ambiguity or give me something else.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by TJCoro View Posti have no ideas waht you talk about cigarsam but thank u just the same for kind words
bb
TJ's gone comeplete mongoloidal since you've left...Originally posted by ValeTudoGuyMarc's a Fat Molly
Comment
-
Originally posted by rascal View PostNever said your tubos had mold, said they are more prone to mold as the tube can become over humidified as is designed to hold humidity in. Do you get what I am saying about the reason your cigars in your tubos are at a higher humidity (The reason the bands are tight and not loose like the other sticks in your humi) Though I do suspect your humi is not running at 69 rh if your bands are coming loose in short time period.
Well the 65% if humidors are not airtight that 65% humidity pack won't be reading what it says on it.
If they say we loose 1 or 2 percent humidity maybe then getting a 72% will bring it down to 69 to 70.
Think the most popular bought bovedas are the 69% ones
Which ones are the rest of the members useing if useing bovedas.
Comment
-
Tony don't forget that a wooden humidor sucks 2% out of it as well Unknown-8.jpeg'Cigars are a hobby, cigarettes an addiction'
Comment
-
Originally posted by PeeJay View PostTony don't forget that a wooden humidor sucks 2% out of it as well [ATTACH=CONFIG]19777[/ATTACH]
If thats the case PJ surely it's best to go for the 72% minus the 2% should keep humidity at 70% whoever prefers their cigars on that kind of humidity
are you a boveda user if so which ones are you useing yourself.
Comment
-
I use them in my Lock''locks which are plastic of course and tend to use 65s and 69s. I have some 72s that I use occasionally if I need to use a wooden cigar box as an overflow. In my humidors I use gel crystals.'Cigars are a hobby, cigarettes an addiction'
Comment
Powered by vBulletin® Version 5.7.5
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT. This page was generated at 07:23 PM.
Comment