I subscribe to a whole number of cigar bloggers online, british and US and other parts of the world, but Americans in particular always say that cuban wrappers dont look as nice as nicuraguians, dominicans or hondurans and tend to be slightly veiny and rustic looking. They also say that cubans always burn unevenly.
I live in london so i smoke pretty much exclusively cubans. only non cuban i have personally tried is the padron 1964 (45 years, 52x6). It was too strong for me because i was a complete beginner smoker so cant really comment on whether it was a good cigar or not because it completely overpowered me (was i think my 3rd cigar that was given to me by a friend who works at a cigar store in london) but i have to say the cigar looked amazing and the wrapper was a lovely dark chocolate slightly bumpy (i think u call it toothy) wrapper, and i have to say the burn was straight all the way to the nub and the ash itself was bright white.
I personally love cubans and will only ever really smoke non cubans from time to time but why do cubans not have that polished finish to them, dont get me wrong there are beautiful looking cubans out there but i feel they are few and far between
I live in london so i smoke pretty much exclusively cubans. only non cuban i have personally tried is the padron 1964 (45 years, 52x6). It was too strong for me because i was a complete beginner smoker so cant really comment on whether it was a good cigar or not because it completely overpowered me (was i think my 3rd cigar that was given to me by a friend who works at a cigar store in london) but i have to say the cigar looked amazing and the wrapper was a lovely dark chocolate slightly bumpy (i think u call it toothy) wrapper, and i have to say the burn was straight all the way to the nub and the ash itself was bright white.
I personally love cubans and will only ever really smoke non cubans from time to time but why do cubans not have that polished finish to them, dont get me wrong there are beautiful looking cubans out there but i feel they are few and far between
Comment